AdvanceAmerica Blog

Archive for the 'media coverage' Category


A little white lie?

Posted by Paul on March 25, 2008

Hillary Clinton’s account of her trip to Bosnia is coming under fire.

Drudge today posted CBS’ account of the Clinton trip to Bosnia, and compared their records to her account last week.

Watch:

Can’t escape anything in politics today. Especially, if you’re traveling with a press corps who are taking constant footage.

The question raised here: can Hillary count experiences as these as “experience?”

Posted in Hillary Clinton, media coverage | No Comments »

Is the media racist?

Posted by Paul on March 21, 2008

“New Race Problem”

That was the bold headline on a bright lit television screen behind Anderson Cooper tonight on CNN. It was about Barack Obama’s recent comments to a reporter discussing his white grandmother’s reaction to African Americans in her time:

“The point I was making was not that my grandmother harbors any racial animosity. She doesn’t. But she’s a typical white person who — if she sees somebody on the street that she doesn’t know — there’s a reaction that’s been bred into our experiences that don’t go away, and that sometimes come out in the wrong way, and that’s just the nature of race in our society. We have to break through it. And what makes me optimistic is you see each generation feeling a little less like that.”

Here is my problem: does anyone really believe that Barack Obama is a racist? Because if you believe that, you’re simply ridiculous. It astounds me that people are incapable of looking at things in a broader context; how can we ignore that there still are racial biases in our society? And what harm does it do for a presidential candidate to not only be cognizant of those biases but raise the dialogue? Obama’s comments addressed his own grandmother’s attitudes, and though they were untactful, they were just. The fact that so many bloggers and talk show hosts can’t grapple with this reality suggests to me that they are either childish or possess ulterior motives to derail the Obama campaign.

But worse to me is the media coverage on the 24 hour news networks. CNN, MSNBC and Fox (<-to the LARGEST extent) have used the Rev. Wright story, and subsequent remarks by Senator Obama as fodder for either promoting a conservative agenda (in the case of Fox) or continuing controversy for the sake of politics (CNN, MSNBC).

This kind of baiting is wrong in an election where we should be discussing the issues. Networks want to discuss the horse race and we want to discuss the problems we face as a nation.

Had Sen. Obama explicitly said, ‘I am a racist’ then certainly the discussion should be about his personal moral character. But to run continuous loops of Rev. Wright’s sermons, gaffes, and “analysis” from otherwise biased persons does not serve journalistic integrity. The media is a self-fulfilling prophecy in this regard; they ask, ‘how will the media cover this story and what impact will it have on the campaign?’… well you tell me.

Honesty is dead; it’s all about reporting stories first, and obtaining the highest viewership. If you’re enlightened enough to realize this congratulations, you’re among the few who aren’t complacent to the dictates of the 24 hour news media nor their corporate masters.

Know that I’m not anti-media, I’m anti-constant punditry and horse-race coverage.

Update:  Check out Chris Wallace, host of Fox News Sunday, talking about FOX’s “Obama bashing” this morning:

Posted in Barack Obama, media coverage, smear campaigns | No Comments »